Blair planned to sack Brown

The Independent reveals government papers which show that Blair planned, in detail, to sack Brown and break up the Treasury, after the last election.

One warning though: the plan seem to have involved John Birt – so no wonder it didn’t go ahead.

But seriously, the detail of this planning – including draft speaking notes for the announcement and a profile of qualities the new chancellor should have – demonstrates a remarkable degree of distrust between Blair and Brown, to an extent which hasn’t previously been clear in such a concrete fashion:

The paper provides the first concrete proof that the speculation was true, including draft speaking notes for the Prime Minister, a briefing for the ” new Chancellor”, as well as a list of personal qualities Mr Brown’s successor should have.

Marked “Copy No 1 – Prime Minister Confidential Policy”, the paper says the new Chancellor’s qualities must include “lack of personal investment in previous policies”. It adds that “teamwork” is a key asset, something that arch-Blairites have accused Mr Brown of being incapable of.

The document adds that on the first day in office Mr Blair should ” convey to the new Chancellor” his plans to split the Treasury and hand many of its key roles, including responsibility for tax credits, to other ministries.

Labour go three points ahead of Tories – Observer poll

Iain Dale reveals that an Observer poll tomorrow will show Labour up to 39%, Conservatives down to 36 % and LibDems down to 15%.

I suppose it was inevitable that the “New Broon” effect would put Labour ahead eventually, especially after the Tories Grammarsgate debacle.

It will be interesting to find out when the interviews for this poll were conducted, especially in relation to the “JobsforLords” farrago this week. That at least gave the LibDems some publicity, which can often be the main dynamic behind our rating.

Kinnock: "What the hell is a Labour Prime Minister doing with George Bush?"

I have just been watching the first part “The Rise and Fall of Tony Blair” on Channel 4.

It was a remarkably clear summary of Tony Blair’s period in office up to 2004. There was an exceptionally qualified cast of interviewees including Condeleeza Rice, Andrew Card, Stephen Wall, Sir David Manning etc as well Labour figures including Jack Straw, Neil Kinnock and David Blunkett. There was also ‘Bazza’ or Barry Cox, a family friend, who was very frank.

So it was a very authoritative account, also bearing in mind that it was narrated by Andrew Rawnsley, who has a reknowned knowledge of “New Labour”.

A few things stood out for me.

It was made clear, in a way that I had never appreciated before, how Blair’s success in getting the US on board to win a victory in Kosovo gave him confidence and a belief that he could sweep all before him in international affairs. That confidence was later to lead to over-confidence in relation to Iraq.

Watching the clip of Blair in the Commons mentioning the “45 minutes” made me realise that this clip will be Blair’s epitaph. It really encapsulates the shattering of the trust in which people held him.

It was telling to hear Stephen Wall describing a conversation with Jacques Chirac about the proposed Iraq invasion. Chriac said that he had been a soldier in Algeria and knew the horror of war at first hand. He said that if Blair/Bush invaded Iraq they wouldn’t be welcomed and they would start a civil war. He added that they shouldn’t mistake the Shia majority for democracy.

Wall said that Blair came out of the meeting with Chirac saying “Poor old Jacques doesn’t get it, does he?” As Wall commented, events proved that, in fact, Jacques “got it” and Blair didn’t.

Neil Kinniock talked with considerable passion when he described the incredulity of Labour stalwarts that Blair got so close with “above all people – George Bush”. In the trailer for the next programme, this sentiment is expressed with even more exasperation by Kinnock with these words, presumably describing the views expressed by Labourites:

What the hell is a Labour Prime Minister doing with George Bush?

BBC criticised over Richard Hammond crash

Before the Richard Hammond crash, Jeremy Clarkson often bleated on about having to fill out Health and safety” forms for BBC’s Top Gear.

Interestingly, despite all these forms, the BBC is criticised, by the Health and Safety Exceutive, on several grounds regarding the Richard Hammond accident. In fairness, the Executive also point to several precautions which saved Hammond’s life. The Guardian reports:

The BBC’s safety guidelines were criticised today by an investigation into the high-speed crash that nearly killed Top Gear presenter Richard Hammond.

A report by the Health and Safety Executive identified failings in the BBC’s “safety management systems” but ruled that no one should be prosecuted over the incident.

Today’s HSE report pointed to failings in the BBC’s risk assessment of Hammond’s daredevil stunt in September last year, in which he drove a jet-powered dragster at speeds of up to 288mph.

The BBC was also criticised for the way in which it procured services from the company that owned the car and trained Hammond for his stunt.

Identifying eight key faults, the HSE said the BBC had failed to allow sufficient time for the planning, preparation and consultation for the shoot at Elvington airfield, near York.

The BBC did not make “full and appropriate use” of in-house support and external technical resources, the watchdog added.

Lembit Opik song by Mervyn Stutter

Every month we have a little family evening out. My wife works behind the bar at the “Blue Hour” at New Greenham Arts. I go up by taxi to join her.

Barb Jungr hosts the Blue Hour very wittily and skilfully. She is a fantastic “chantreuse” and I have learnt a great deal about the songs of Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan and many others, by attending her sets.

It was the end of the season last night. As a treat, she introduced Mervyn Stutter, who is a “comedian, actor, scriptwriter and satirical songwriter”. He was a member of the “Flying Pickets”, has had shows on Radios Two and Four and is a regular of the Edinburgh Fringe.

He was absolutely hilarious. Really funny, and a great performer. His targets were across the spectrum of life and politics. The LibDems got quite a lot of attention from him. Needless to say he had a song founded on the Mark Oaten and Simon Hughes stories from last year. But he also sang a song devoted to Lembit Opik. It was to the tune of “Bend it” by Dave, Dee, Dozy, Mick and Titch. The song basically drew on Lembit’s asteroid predictions and his affairs with Sian Lloyd and the Cheeky Girl. It wasn’t cruel towards Lembit, but it was quite lewd and hilarious.

Needless to say we were in stitches, and fortunately I did not have a sign above my head saying “LibDem activist”, so there was no need to go red with embarrassment.

Labour go three points ahead of Tories – Observer poll

Iain Dale reveals that an Observer poll tomorrow will show Labour up to 39%, Conservatives down to 36 % and LibDems down to 15%.

I suppose it was inevitable that the “New Broon” effect would put Labour ahead eventually, especially after the Tories Grammarsgate debacle.

It will be interesting to find out when the interviews for this poll were conducted, especially in relation to the “JobsforLords” farrago this week. That at least gave the LibDems some publicity, which can often be the main dynamic behind our rating.

Memories of Harold Wilson

I met Harold Wilson on August 17th 1990 at a musical review production on the Isles of Scilly. My wife and I were going to watch the gig racing that evening but it was chucking it down. So the only entertainment we could find was this review. There were only two tickets left, because it was only a few minutes before the production, and I was separated from my wife. The booking lady gave me a seat right down the front at the side, which had been marked with an “X” as if no one should sit in it.

I was rather surprised to find myself sitting next to Lord Wilson. I sat next to him during the production and chatted to him before it started and in the interval. He struck me as being a lovable old grandpa, and I wouldn’t have guessed that he was ill. He did actually remember several things in detail. Here are some of notes I wrote the same day of the meeting:

Pointing to the ‘No Smoking’ sign Harold Wilson said: “I haven’t brought my pipes of course, but there used to be a thing called “Nosmo King” – I’m surprised Her Majesty’s Inspectors didn’t crack down on it because they were normally quite tough on that sort of thing.

After most of the musical pieces, he turned to me and said “That’s very good”. He laughed at the comic pieces and after one hilarious tableau involving “lifeboat men” in huge sea wellies “rescuing” (carrying off) women to an accompaniment of buckets of “sea” (water) being thrown over them, he turned to me and said: “I think this will go down as the best they’ve ever done.”

He asked me where I came from and whether I was busy. He said he came from “‘Uddersfield” but when he was quite small his father got told to move to Lancashire so they had to move – but it was alright in the end. He said his father was a top industrial man and he (Harold) went to college then to Oxford for three years on a scholarship, then he was a lecturer for a few years, then he went “down South”. He said he lived very near the House of Lords and when he wasn’t there he did a lot of walking.

He said the Lords were very gentlemanly and after the debates they talked to each other and said things like “Why did you say that?” in the bar.

He said that he started his parliamentary career in the House of Lords because the House of Commons had been bombed. “Not a lot of people know that”, he said. He said that when he was Prime Minister the Isles of Scilly nearly ran out of money. So he gave an order for them to be given more money – “I got a man in and gave him the order”. “After all”, he said “they give a lot of money to the Scottish Isles, so why not the Scillies?”. Anyway, he said, he was going there in three weeks time so it would have been rather embarrassing if the islands had been closed when he got there!

He said his son was a top Maths person and had been to the States about 12 times.

During the concert we all sang “Happy Birthday” for one of the cast. At the end, noting that I had a low singing voice like him, he said to me “We’re both stuck with bass, I’m afraid.”

From my memory, he said that he had “been Prime Minister for three terms” (I think it was three that he said – I didn’t make a note of that sentence) and when I said I had been out fishing and saw the Trinity House surveying ship, he mentioned that he was an Elder Brother of Trinity House.

I mention all this because it is often thought that Wilson spent his whole life in a dark cloud from 1980. But, as Lady Wilson confirms, he was “very calm”. He was ill, but my conversation shows that even in that illness he had patches of what I would describe, for his age at the time, as perfectly normal behaviour.

There is an excellent and rare interview with Mary Wilson, widow of Harold Wilson, in the Daily Mail today. It was conducted by Roy Hattersley. It is worth a read.

It is a timely reminder of the last Labour Prime Minister who stood down voluntarily. Mary Wilson says of the 1976 resignation:

As she charts his decline, she gives the lie to the persistent rumour that there was something deeply mysterious about his surprise resignation. Among the more sinister whispers was that MI5 had been about to expose him as a KGB agent.

At the time, Harold Wilson was a fixture in everyone’s lives: the pipe-smoking PM who had devalued “the pound in your pocket”, confirmed our membership of the Common Market and predicted the “white heat” of the coming technological revolution.

There seemed no reason for him to step down – and no convincing explanation was put forward. But the truth, Mary says, is simple. After his unexpected election victory in 1974, “Harold always meant to go quite quickly”.

So why did he choose to make his announcement in the spring of 1976?

“He’d had enough. There was a seamen’s strike, which he had just dealt with. He told me that he could not deal with it with the same level of energy, the same zest . . . and, possibly, he began to feel that his memory was going.”

The article also reminds us that the Wilsons did not move into Downing Street after Labour’s 1974 election victory, but stayed in their flat in Lord North Street. That, in itself, retrospectively, perhaps, confirms that Wilson didn’t intend to stay long in office when he won in 1974.

However, it is strange to see Hattersley writing: “There seemed no reason for him to step down” because on Question Time, a few weeks ago, Hattersley inferred that Wilson was forced to step down. Perhaps we can put it down to Roy H being in a pressurised situation on the programme – he was on the ropes a bit on the question he was answering at the time.

Kinnock: "What the hell is a Labour Prime Minister doing with George Bush?"

I have just been watching the first part “The Rise and Fall of Tony Blair” on Channel 4.

It was a remarkably clear summary of Tony Blair’s period in office up to 2004. There was an exceptionally qualified cast of interviewees including Condeleeza Rice, Andrew Card, Stephen Wall, Sir David Manning etc as well Labour figures including Jack Straw, Neil Kinnock and David Blunkett. There was also ‘Bazza’ or Barry Cox, a family friend, who was very frank.

So it was a very authoritative account, also bearing in mind that it was narrated by Andrew Rawnsley, who has a reknowned knowledge of “New Labour”.

A few things stood out for me.

It was made clear, in a way that I had never appreciated before, how Blair’s success in getting the US on board to win a victory in Kosovo gave him confidence and a belief that he could sweep all before him in international affairs. That confidence was later to lead to over-confidence in relation to Iraq.

Watching the clip of Blair in the Commons mentioning the “45 minutes” made me realise that this clip will be Blair’s epitaph. It really encapsulates the shattering of the trust in which people held him.

It was telling to hear Stephen Wall describing a conversation with Jacques Chirac about the proposed Iraq invasion. Chriac said that he had been a soldier in Algeria and knew the horror of war at first hand. He said that if Blair/Bush invaded Iraq they wouldn’t be welcomed and they would start a civil war. He added that they shouldn’t mistake the Shia majority for democracy.

Wall said that Blair came out of the meeting with Chirac saying “Poor old Jacques doesn’t get it, does he?” As Wall commented, events proved that, in fact, Jacques “got it” and Blair didn’t.

Neil Kinniock talked with considerable passion when he described the incredulity of Labour stalwarts that Blair got so close with “above all people – George Bush”. In the trailer for the next programme, this sentiment is expressed with even more exasperation by Kinnock with these words, presumably describing the views expressed by Labourites:

What the hell is a Labour Prime Minister doing with George Bush?

The perils of blogging

I have discovered a hazard of blogging I did not previously anticipate. Yesterday, I blogged about Eric Faulkner’s appearance, prior to Tony Benn, at Glastonbury. I embedded a YouTube video of Mr Faulner’s former group, The Bay City Rollers, singing “Summer Love Sensation”.

As I made clear, I hated the Rollers’ music. However, I checked the video by watching it. Lo and behold, nearly a day later, I still have the damned tune going round in my head! I just can’t get it out of my mind.

Well, it could have been worse. It could have been the cerebral “Shang-a-lang”:

…well we sang shang-a-lang as we ran with the gang
doin doo wop be dooby do ay
we were all in the news
with our blue suede shoes
and our dancin the night away.

…shang-a-lang,
shang-a-lang,
shang-a-lang
shang-a-lang, shang-a-lang, shang-a-lang

written by P Coulter and B Martin.

BBC criticised over Richard Hammond crash

Before the Richard Hammond crash, Jeremy Clarkson often bleated on about having to fill out Health and safety” forms for BBC’s Top Gear.

Interestingly, despite all these forms, the BBC is criticised, by the Health and Safety Exceutive, on several grounds regarding the Richard Hammond accident. In fairness, the Executive also point to several precautions which saved Hammond’s life. The Guardian reports:

The BBC’s safety guidelines were criticised today by an investigation into the high-speed crash that nearly killed Top Gear presenter Richard Hammond.

A report by the Health and Safety Executive identified failings in the BBC’s “safety management systems” but ruled that no one should be prosecuted over the incident.

Today’s HSE report pointed to failings in the BBC’s risk assessment of Hammond’s daredevil stunt in September last year, in which he drove a jet-powered dragster at speeds of up to 288mph.

The BBC was also criticised for the way in which it procured services from the company that owned the car and trained Hammond for his stunt.

Identifying eight key faults, the HSE said the BBC had failed to allow sufficient time for the planning, preparation and consultation for the shoot at Elvington airfield, near York.

The BBC did not make “full and appropriate use” of in-house support and external technical resources, the watchdog added.