Cross-posted from Liberal Democrat Voice
It’s funny how a simple statement of congratulations on a planned wedding can’t be accepted in the Commons without a “handbag moment” (see Reeves/Mortimer) dredging up twenty year-old events. Ed Miliband thanked David Cameron for his congratulations adding “I might have to come to him in the next couple of months for advice, because I know that he knows how to organise memorable stag nights.” Ooooh!
Handbags having been safely stowed, Ed Miliband raised the matter of the stampede of British universities to join the “£9,000 club”. Cameron replied that the Office for Fair Access will decide on which universities can charge £9,000 a year. He also neatly side-stepped Miliband’s charge that the stampede could mean further cuts in the government’s funding to universities.
We then returned to a subject previously aired at Prime Minister’s Questions: when is a plod a “frontline” plod? Answer: there’s a team of experts working on that one. However, Cameron introduced a new googly into the debate on this subject: “According to Home Office statistics, if all forces achieve the current best average for visibility and availability, it would increase the number of officers available by 8,000.” Wooo!
“Two thousand police officers are being forced out under the A19 rules” rebutted Miliband. You could hear a “whoosh” as this subject flew well over the top of most people’s heads.
Miliband ended with “we proposed 12% cuts in the policing budget; the Prime Minister is proposing 20% cuts. Her Majesty’s inspectorate of constabulary said that if we go beyond 12%, that is likely to lead to cuts in front-line officers, which is exactly what is happening up and down this country.” You can’t help but thinking that Miliband has more or less won this one. But it’s getting a trifle repetitive.
“The difference between a 12% reduction and what we are proposing is the freeze in police pay and the reform of police allowances, which he refuses to support” said Cameron. Not really a Tory-type policy that, is it? – Freezing police pay and “reforming” their allowances.
I thought Cameron then came back with a riposte which Miliband deserved: “Has anyone seen a more ridiculous spectacle than the right hon. Gentleman marching against the cuts that his Government caused? I know Martin Luther King said he had a dream—I think it is time the right hon. Gentleman woke up.”
Other snippets were:
- Greg Mulholland (LibDem) asked about the children’s heart unit review.
- Tenuouslinkwatch: David Amess tried to link Pontius Pilate to Ed Miliband addressing crowds in Hyde Park. But it got a good quality response from Cameron: “Far from standing on the shoulders of the suffragettes, or whatever nonsense we heard at the weekend, the fact is that the Leader of the Opposition is sitting in a great big pool of debt that was his creation, and he has got absolutely no idea what to do about it.”
- Flashman put down of the week: From Cameron to Chris Williamson (Lab): “I cannot believe that I accused the hon. Gentleman of anything because I had absolutely no idea who he was.”
- Sir Menzies Campbell (LibDem) raised the legal and political risks of arming rebels in Libya.
- Even though Ed Balls didn’t say anything worthy of registering in Hansard, he managed to make a spectacle of himself, earning another Flasmanesque put-down: “I may be alone in finding the shadow Chancellor the most annoying person in modern politics.” Temper, temper.
- Malcolm Bruce (LibDem) asked about investment in North Sea Oil, following the withdraw of £6 billion of funding by Statoil.
News that should receive a cautious welcome from LibDems, following our conference resolution. George Eaton in the Staggers says that the reforms are slowing, while Alastair Campbell says Lanlsey should watch his back:
… the Prime Minister’s political instincts finally appear to be kicking in, and he is seeking to avert the car crash Lansley has inadvertently caused. A succession of ministers has already learned that the Prime Minister tends to let them get on with it, pays scant attention to detail during policy planning, but then finds he has to step in.
It is becoming harder and harder to find an expert voice or a vested interest (sometimes the two are combined) who thinks the non-mandated reforms will do anything other than real damage to healthcare. Cameron has had his jibe at the BMA as being just another trade union, but beneath the bravado, he is getting worried, and looking to make change.
This is going to sound like a Dyson marketing department press release but I’ll go with it anyway. I’ve been using Dyson airblades increasingly to dry my hands in…er….facilities. They are popping up everywhere. They sort of blow your socks off while drying your hands in about half a nano second. They are the most effective, if not the only really effective, hand driers I have come across.
Putting your hands in one is like putting your hands in the jet stream of a Boeing 747.
So I joked, at first, that each one should have a live screen above them showing the Greenland iceberg melting as you use them – such were the carbon emissions which I imagined them giving off, due to their high power.
But I should not have jested in such a flagrantly unfounded way. I sat down and did a little googling and found that Dyson Airblades are so green that the Carbon Trust has awarded them a Carbon Reduction Label, the first ever given to a hand drier.
So that told me…
Here’s what the Carbon Trust say about the Dyson Airblade:
This commitment to Green Growth through design is exemplified by the Dyson Airblade™, a product the Carbon Trust has come to know well as a result of our product footprinting work with the company. The Dyson Airblade™ is ground-breaking – a design which:
- Works by blasting a sheet of unheated air at 400 mph, to scrape water from hands in 10 seconds.
- A small, long-life, low-energy and brushless motor spinning at 1,666 revolutions per second, the Dyson Digital motor produces enough air pressure for the Dyson Airblade™ to dry hands without the need for heat.
- Doesn’t require a power-hungry heating element to work, unlike conventional hand dryers, making it 80% more energy efficient.
- Avoids paper towel waste in landfills.
Dyson approached us to learn and demonstrate how his model was energy efficient to minimise environmental impact, and to get our help to drive its carbon footprint even lower. We provided advice and data analysis using our Footprint Expert™ software. As a result of these efforts, The Dyson Airblade™ hand dryer was certified by the Carbon Trust Footprinting Certification Company; the first ever hand dryer to be awarded the Carbon Reduction Label.
Last night we saw an excellent school production of a scaled-down Macbeth. (I’m not a luvvie so there’ll be no “Scottish play” nonsense from me).
It was an excellent production – flawlessly presented with some inspiring performances. It’s a challenging play but these Year 9 students flawlessly presented their lines.
It was a delight to see a boy playing one of three witches. All of the witches were just dressed in black T shirts and trousers. So, it was a bit weird hearing the boy being referred to as “sister”. But it worked beautifully – trust me.
What was even stranger was that the boy witch then got hold of a sword and starting fighting with Macbeth. That one threw me. Try as I might, I couldn’t recall that one in our Bill’s original script.
Subsequent questioning revealed that the same boy played one of the witches and Macduff, without any costume change.
During a fascinating discussion on tax avoidance, a radio broadcaster recently revealed that they claim back tax on their TV as a business expense. “I need to watch TV for my job”, they insisted.
It’s an interesting point. How can we criticise the Phillip Greens and the Vodafones of this world for (legal) tax avoidance when we ourselves are following the tax rules to pay less tax by, for example, by investing in ISAs?
In the same programme, the broadcaster allowed themselves to be congratulated on their child winning a schools competition, the result of which is on the internet, including the broadcaster’s child’s school name. I couldn’t resist then looking up the fees for that school. £4,350 a term.
…It’s an interesting juxtaposition. Claiming back tax on one’s TV while being able to pay out £1,100 a month to educate just one child.
– Nothing wrong with either things, of course. But it is interesting.
I haven’t named the broadcaster simply because I didn’t feel comfortable doing so, despite all the above information being easily available publicly. (A quick listen and two quick Google searches did it). I feel slightly sorry for the broadcaster. Due to work commitments they were unable to see their child winning the schools competition. So, is all that money and work worth it? Well, you pays your money and takes your choice. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.
1. “Fiji is changing its mind on AV”
The Prime Minister, from Hansard 9th March:
I will be campaigning hard for a no vote in the referendum. I think that it is a relatively simple argument to make. We have a system that is simple, clear and easy to explain. The alternative vote is used in only three countries. They are Australia, Fiji and Papua New Guinea—and Fiji is beginning to change its mind.
So that sounds as if the great populace of Fiji has decided, as one, that they can’t stand AV anymore and want it replaced, right? Wrong. Commodore Frank Bainimarama, who obtained his position as Prime Minister after the latest of four military coups in Fiji, decided to change the voting system. For its failure to hold elections, Fiji was expelled both from the Pacific Islands Forum and the Commonwealth of nations in 2009.
2. Poster saying: “He (actor pretending to be a soldier) needs bulletproof vests not an alternative voting system. Say NO to spending £250million on AV. Our country can’t afford it.”
Where do you start with this one? It’s based on the downright lie that AV will cost more money than FPTP. And if you take the poster’s statement to its logical extreme, we’d stop having elections and spend money on wars instead.
But surely, if you’re fighting for your country, you’re entitled to a decent voting system to come home to and provide the government which supports you, are you not? Or do you have to put up with an 18th century hangover just so the government can afford bullet proof vests, which they should be providing anyway?
3. “If Olympic Ski Jumping had adopted #AV Eddie the Eagle might have won a Gold”
This tweet provides an interesting insight into the thinking of some of the NotoAV supporters.
Eddie “The Eagle” Edwards came last in the 70 metre ski jump at the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics. The ski jump is a measured event. If you jump the longest distance you win. It doesn’t even involve judges’ scores. So how “might Eddie the Eagle have won a Gold medal” under AV?
Here are some ideas:
- AV may have caused all the other jumpers to throw their hands up in despair and not bother to jump
- AV may have caused an earthquake in Calgary at the moment Eddie the Eagle jumped, consuming much of the ski jump landing area. Eddie then jumped over the resultant chasm in the earth’s surface, meaning that he jumped, technically, a further distance than he actually did.
- When he jumped, AV may have caused Eddie the Eagle to emit a self-combusting fart which propelled him into Alaska, no doubt landing in Sarah Palin’s sitting room, which would have been fortuitous because she, I suspect, opposes AV.
photo credit: Obama-Biden Transition Project
“Reporter imprisoned in a closet at Joe Biden fundraiser” was the headline on the Gawker. Similar lurid stories zoomed a million times around the world via Twitter, Facebook, blogs and newswires.
The truth is a little less lurid. It was cock-up rather than lock-up. Here is the full story from the Orlando Sentinel reporter at the centre of the story, Scott Powers:
Take a couple details of information, toss them into the Internet and it can become like a child’s game of telephone — with each rendition adding spin and details. Only in this politically-charged environment, those spin and details can crystallize toward scandal. That’s especially true when it involves the vice president of the United States in an administration that has enraged a segment of American society.